So, I ask you my friends to tell me which version of my photos you like best and why. Some are a result of using a different cropping tool and some are playing around with saturation and vibrancy. The one black and white is not very good, but I included it to show you another example of how the sky can just be totally blah and ruin your otherwise good shot.
Just pretty much what I saw tonight. See the blob of light near the bottom of the tallest building on the left hand side? The crop is unusual here. In my software (Aperture 3 for MAC) there is an HD crop which I assume mimics the HD television format. Not sure how you would get an image this shape printed, but I bet there is a way.
This is a standard 8X10 crop, which as you can see shows much more of the foreground and as you can see I am also not zoomed in quite as much. What I did in this shot was to darken the trees and grass and I turned up the green in the picture to give it a different feel or mood.
Another HD crop, but this time I darkened the exposure and saturated the green at the same time. Looks kind of like a storm might be brewing with the sky being that kind of color to me. I was hoping you would be able to see the lights that outline the buildings. I could see them but the camera can't because of the interference from the ball field lights tonight.
This one is pretty much cropped like the first picture, but I just turned up the color saturation on everything to maximum. To me it seems there is bright light from the sunset illuminating the buildings while the foreground remains in shadow and is therefore cool in color.
This is the same shot with a square crop which is different from standard and from HD.
This is the black and white and although I don't care much for it because of the totally blank sky, it does have kind of an industrial feel to it and I might like it better in an HD crop. Seems wintry even though it is June and everything is very green from two days of really good rain that we had earlier in the week.
In this shot, I just zoomed in more tightly, trying in vain to keep those pesky ball field lights out of my pictures. I think what I need to do instead is to get myself informed of the home game schedule of the Fort Worth Cats and avoid those nights. Or I could go very early and get a sunrise shot to see how that changes things up. Don't hold your breath waiting for me to do that. I am more of a night owl!
Same HD cropped and up close and personal like the one above but without the color saturation. In the last two there is no water in the foreground. I happen to prefer the ones with the water as it serves as a leading line into the photo for the eye to follow.
Perhaps what I also need to do is to explore different venues for taking shots of downtown like high on a parking garage somewhere. You used to be able to get a really pretty shot from the lawn or the steps of the Amon Carter museum, but the Kimble is adding on and there is a big crane blocking the view, plus the trees have matured to the point where they obscure the view as well. If only I could get on the roof of the Montgomery Plaza building. They have a killer view up there I understand but no water in the foreground of course. Stay tuned to later in the summer for more versions of my quest to get a good skyline picture. In the meantime, I would appreciate your opinions on which is your favorite and why.